Dugin Mikhail Nikolaevich in 1945. Russian historiography of the modern history of Russia and the history of the USSR - Vladislav Volkov

January 1955 marked the beginning of the “black” mythologization of Soviet history and the peak of Nikita KHRUSHCHEV’s struggle for sole power. His main competitor, Lavrentiy BERIA, had already been accused of treason, shot and became such a scapegoat that the Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary soon even stopped mentioning his name

Although in the famous Khrushchev report on the cult of personality of STALIN it is mentioned 61 times along with the name of the leader. Many researchers were convinced: Nikita Sergeevich not only slandered prominent government figures, but also contributed to their death. But they couldn’t scientifically prove their versions. Recently discovered archival materials allowed historian Alexander DUGIN to document Khrushchev's lies for the first time.

- Alexander Nikolaevich, what new did you find in the archive?

I went to the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History to see what documents on the history of the 1950s were transferred to RGASPI from the archive of the President of the Russian Federation. And I discovered a lot of interesting things. Firstly, confirmation of the words of Valentin Falin - he prepared analytical notes for all the country's leaders from Stalin to Yeltsin. Wrote Khrushchev's foreign policy speeches. And in 2011, he risked publicly declaring that Khrushchev, wanting to seize archival documents about his participation in the repressions, ordered the creation of a group of 200 special employees not only to seize genuine documents, but also to make fakes. Secondly, I discovered these forgeries in the “Beria case” and realized that among the falsifiers there were also honest officers who left “beacons” for their descendants to recognize the forgery.

- What kind of “beacons”?

There are several of them.

In any case of high treason, which Khrushchev accused Beria of, according to the then Criminal Procedure Code, there must be photographs of the persons involved in the case, their fingerprints, and protocols of confrontations. But in the materials of the “Beria case” there is not a single photograph of him, not a single fingerprint, not a single protocol of confrontations with any of his “accomplices”.

In addition, on the interrogation protocols there is not a single signature of Beria himself, nor is there a single signature of the investigator of the Prosecutor General’s Office for the most important cases of Tsaregradsky. There is only the signature of Major Administrative Service Yuryeva. And on many of the interrogation protocols of Beria there are no mandatory office-work “marks”: the initials of the executive typist, the number of printed copies, mailing addressees, etc. But all of the above are just external signs of a fake.

- Were there any internal signs of forgery?

Certainly. One of the handwritten “originals” of Beria’s letters, allegedly written by him when he was already under arrest, bears the date “VI.28.1953,” literally screaming “don’t believe it!” You can find it at the link: RGASPI, f.17, op.171, d. 463, l.163.

- What exactly do you “don’t believe”?

The letter is addressed to “To the Central Committee of the CPSU, Comrade Malenkov.” In it, Beria speaks of his devotion to the party’s cause and asks his comrades-in-arms - Malenkov, Molotov, Voroshilov, Khrushchev, Kaganovich, Bulganin and Mikoyan: “let them forgive, if anything was wrong during these fifteen years of great and intense joint work.”

And he wishes them great success in the struggle for the cause of Lenin - Stalin. In tone, it resembles a note to friends and colleagues, written by a person who is going on vacation or who has decided to stay at home for a couple of days due to a cold. And it begins like this: “I was sure that from that great criticism at the Presidium I would draw all the necessary conclusions for myself and would be useful in the team. But the Central Committee decided otherwise, I think that the Central Committee did the right thing.” After reading this I was almost speechless!

The fact is that neither before nor after Stalin’s death Beria was subjected to any “great criticism” at any meetings of the Presidium. The first meeting of the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee, at which serious accusations of Beria’s anti-state and anti-party actions were suddenly heard, took place on June 29, 1953. That is, the day AFTER this letter from Beria from his cell.

- You were almost speechless because of the date?

Yes. If the letter were genuine, it would reject the version of a number of my colleagues, which I shared one hundred percent. That Beria was killed at noon on June 26, 1953 in his mansion on Kachalova Street, now Malaya Nikitskaya.

- Killed by whom?

- A special group sent to Lavrenty Pavlovich on Khrushchev’s order by Beria’s first deputy in the Ministry of State Security, Sergei Kruglov. Lieutenant General Andrei Vedenin, former commander rifle corps, who became commandant of the Kremlin in September 1953, described how his unit received the order to carry out Operation Mansion to eliminate Beria. And how it was performed. Then Beria's corpse was taken to the Kremlin and presented to members of the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee. After such a “confrontation,” the Khrushchevites could, without fear, at the Plenum of the Central Committee on July 2–7, 1953, accuse Beria of all mortal sins. Win five months to clear the archives to destroy traces of your crimes.

And to instill in the people the official version of Khrushchev: they say, the former Minister of Internal Affairs of the USSR, ex-Deputy Chairman of the State Defense Committee and member of the Stalinist Politburo was shot for treason on December 23, 1953 by court decision. And with Beria alive, Khrushchev could not have hidden the poisoning of Stalin and his complicity in this crime, which I have already described in detail. Let me remind you that, in my opinion, in this double murder - first of Stalin, then of Beria - two people were most interested. The first was the Minister of State Security in 1951 - 1953, Semyon Ignatiev, to whom Stalin had serious questions in connection with a number of scandalous scandals initiated by this man trials. Including the “Doctors’ Case” and the murder of Kirov. On March 2, 1953, the Presidium of the Central Committee was already supposed to consider the issue of removing Ignatiev from his post. The second interested party is Khrushchev, Ignatiev’s supervisor, who since 1946 held the most important post of deputy head of the Department of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks for checking party officials and carried out all repressions against the leadership of the party and the state. If his ward failed, Khrushchev would also have thundered to the fanfare. At 10:30 pm on March 1, Stalin was found unconscious on the floor. After his death, Beria sorted through Stalin’s archive and, studying the history of his illness, could have suspected the named couple.

There was a double in prison.

- What exactly was Stalin poisoned with?

Commenting on the medical data published in the recently published book by Sigismund Mironin “How Stalin was Poisoned. Forensic medical examination", the chief toxicologist of Moscow, Honored Doctor of Russia Yuri Ostapenko said that the leader was probably poisoned with tablets with an increased dose of a drug that reduces blood clotting. Since 1940, dicumarin was the first and main representative of anticoagulants; for vascular problems and thrombosis, it was recommended to use it in small doses constantly, like aspirin today. However, due to its high toxicity, it was withdrawn from use at the end of the last century.

As a prophylactic measure, drink it once a day, in the afternoon. The laboratories of the NKVD-NKGB-MGB did not cost anything to produce tablets with an increased dosage and put them in regular packaging. After all, Ignatiev himself oversaw Stalin’s personal security.

But someone had to see Beria alive in his cell to confirm the version that he spent five months in prison, awaiting execution?

He had several doubles. And, note, the funds of Molotov, Zhdanov and a number of other recipients of Beria’s “letters” are publicly available, but there are still no funds of Khrushchev and Beria. And in the official collection “The Politburo and the Beria Case” there is not a single fact confirmed by documents that could be qualified as treason. But I managed to find an important document from Stalin’s personal archive. He confirms that Khrushchev, accusing Beria of voluntary service in the Musavatist counterintelligence that fought the labor movement in Azerbaijan, knew very well that he was blatantly lying. This document, dated November 20, 1920, reports that Beria was infiltrated into the counterintelligence censorship department on instructions from the Azerbaijani Communist Party. It was last requested from Stalin’s archive in July 1953, when the “Beria case” was fabricated. But for obvious reasons, he was not involved in it.

The body was poured with concrete.

- Are you convinced that the “letters from the cell” are fake?

Yes sir. I took them to an independent handwriting examination. The chief specialist of RGASPI, Mikhail Strakhov, helped me find Beria’s original handwriting. To keep everything clean and honest, I chose lines from which it is impossible to understand who is writing to whom, and I paid for the examination out of my own pocket so that no one could influence its result. According to experts, the samples I presented were written by different people.

And this conclusion confirms that the reprisal against Beria occurred due to the fact that, having taken the post of head of the combined Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of State Security, he was looking for an answer to the question of the real reasons for Stalin’s death. If he remained alive, there would be no revelations about the personality cult of Joseph Vissarionovich at the height of “ cold war» the conversation would not have come into play. And in 1961, when Norwegian biochemists analyzed Napoleon’s hair on behalf of the French government and found out that he was poisoned with arsenic, no one would urgently convene an extraordinary congress of the CPSU. And he did not raise the unexpected question of removing Stalin’s body from the Mausoleum and concreting it. Khrushchev covered his tracks!

- Why do you care so deeply about this whole story?

I decided to do this because I can’t calmly watch how the heroes of “Fricopedia” like Rezun-Suvorov and Radzinsky try to erase from people’s memory all the positive moments of Soviet history, painting it only in dirty tones. And the man, especially a young man who despises the past of his country cannot respect his present and build his future in a state where his father, grandfather, great-grandfather are exposed as cattle.

Born on April 26, 1921 in the village of Durnikha, now Ramensky district of the Moscow region, in a peasant family. He graduated from 7 classes, 2 years of mechanical engineering college in the city of Lyubertsy, Moscow region in 1940, and a flying club. Since 1940 in the Red Army. In 1941 he graduated from the Kachin Military Aviation Pilot School.

Since April 1943, Junior Lieutenant N.D. Dugin in the active army. He received baptism of fire in the spring of 1943 in the Kuban, then he fought for the liberation of Crimea, Belarus, and participated in the battle for Berlin. He fought on the North Caucasus, 4th Ukrainian, 3rd and 1st Belorussian fronts.

By February 1945, deputy squadron commander, also navigator of the 402nd Fighter Aviation Regiment (265th Fighter Aviation Division, 3rd Fighter Aviation Corps, 16th Air Army, 1st Belorussian Front) Captain N.D. Dugin made 325 combat sorties, in 77 air battles he shot down 14 enemy aircraft and 1 balloon, and destroyed another 6 aircraft at airfields. Before the end of the war he shot down 2 more planes.

On May 2, 1945, having been wounded in battle, he managed to land the damaged car at his airfield and died in the cockpit. He was buried in the city of Falkendsee (Germany).

On May 15, 1946, for courage and military valor shown in battles with enemies, he was posthumously awarded the title of Hero Soviet Union.

Awarded the Orders of Lenin, the Red Banner (twice), Alexander Nevsky, Patriotic War 2nd degree, Krasnaya Zvezdyzh; medals. A street in the city of Zhukovsky, Moscow region, is named after him. The name of the Hero is inscribed on a marble slab at the bronze monument to Soviet soldiers in Berlin.

* * *

Coming from a poor background, Nikolai experienced poverty from childhood. Nikolai spent his childhood in his native village, where he lived until 1933. Then the Dugin family moved to the village of Kolonets. Studied at Udelninskaya high school Ramensky district. After graduating from the 7th grade of a rural school, he went to the city of Lyubertsy, where he entered the FZU school, and then to the evening department of the mechanical engineering college at the A.V. Ukhtomsky plant. At the same time he worked as a technician and experimenter at TsAGI.

In my 2nd year, together with my friends, I signed up for the Ramensky flying club. This dramatically changed Nikolai's fate. After graduating from the flying club in April 1940, he was drafted into the Red Army and became a cadet at the Kachin Military Aviation Pilot School. And the time became more and more alarming: the fire of the Second World War flared up. And the cadets felt that, despite the non-aggression treaty with Germany, a fight with fascism could not be avoided.

In the spring of 1941, the next graduation of fighter pilots took place at the aviation school. Dugin and his friends hoped to serve in the European part of the country, so that, if necessary, they could meet the enemy in the front ranks. But the young pilots, to their great disappointment, were sent to the Far East. There were large forces of Soviet troops there opposing the Kwantung Army, concentrated in Manchuria near our borders.

Realizing the importance of his stay in the Far Eastern land, Sergeant Major Dugin still strove to where the war was already in full swing. With great joy he received the news of the defeat of the Nazi hordes under the walls of his native Moscow and Stalingrad. Finally, almost 2 years after the start of the war, his time came. In the spring of 1943, the 402nd Air Regiment became part of the 3rd Fighter Air Corps of the High Command Reserve (commander General - Aviation Major E. Ya. Savitsky), which was transferred to Kuban.



Yak-1 fighter of one of the aviation regiments of the 3rd IAK RGK. Kuban, spring 1943.

By that time, on the Taman Peninsula, the enemy, retreating from the Caucasus, had created a strongly fortified and deeply echeloned defense line, the so-called Blue Line, with its flanks resting on the Azov and Black Seas. The Germans hoped to take revenge for the defeat at Stalingrad and concentrated a large group of troops and selected air formations in this direction. Stubborn battles for air supremacy ensued, in which the pilots of the 3rd IAK immediately became involved.

On April 20, 1943, fighters of the 402nd IAP covered the Il-2 group, which took off to strike enemy infantry and artillery battle formations in front of the positions of the landing detachment holding a bridgehead on the Myskhako Peninsula near Novorossiysk. While approaching the target, the crews came under heavy fire from enemy anti-aircraft artillery. Having overcome the fire curtain, the attack aircraft first bombed, and then carried out several attacks, using eres and on-board weapons. The enemy suffered heavy losses in manpower and equipment.

The successful completion of the combat mission by the attack aircraft was ensured by the clear and coordinated actions of the cover group, which decisively and skillfully repelled all attempts by fascist fighters to attack our Ilys. In a stubborn battle, the pilots of the 402nd Air Regiment destroyed 9 Messers, one of which was shot down by Lieutenant N.D. Dugin. The first day at the front and the first victory. And others followed her. For military successes, courage and bravery shown in air battles, corps commander General E. Ya. Savitsky, by order of April 25, awarded the young pilot the Order of the Patriotic War, 2nd degree.

The first successes and awards strengthened Nikolai’s confidence in his abilities, but did not turn his head. But in the regiment, good pilots, young and healthy guys, often died because of annoying miscalculations, ardor and passion. The bitterness of losses forced Dugin to learn from his older, more experienced comrades, consult with them, and adopt battle-tested tactics. Gradually, a cold-blooded air fighter emerged from him, fighting the enemy boldly and prudently.

The regiment's command increasingly began sending the Lieutenant on independent missions and reconnaissance. In a relatively short time in the active army, Nikolai Dugin went through a glorious military path and rose from an ordinary pilot to deputy squadron commander.

So, on September 18, 1943, on the Southern Front, he and the leading Major G.S. Balashov flew out on a “free hunt.” In the Gulyai-Polya area (Zaporozhye region), the pilots met 15 He-111 bombers flying in the direction of our front line, accompanied by 6 Me-109s. The presenter commanded: “Nikolai, I’m attacking, cover!” Having stunned the enemy with a sudden attack, the “hunters” immediately shot down 2 planes: Balashov - a Heinkel, and Dugin - a Messer. The enemy's formation crumbled. The bombers hastily cleared their bombs and turned back. The fighters also left the battlefield. However, Soviet pilots began to pursue them. Nikolai on his Yak caught up with one and in several bursts turned it into a torch, which fell into the floodplain.

In early February 1944, a pair of pilots from the 402nd Fighter Aviation Regiment, led by Junior Lieutenant Sh. M. Abdrashitov, discovered a concentration of up to 200 enemy transport aircraft at one of the airfields. For the attack, 2 groups of fighters were sent, which were headed by the squadron commander, Lieutenant V.A. Egorovich, and his deputy, Senior Lieutenant O.P. Makarov. In the ensuing air battle on the approaches to the airfield, our pilots shot down 2 Me-109s and then set fire to several aircraft on the ground. 2 Junkers were destroyed by Lieutenants Sh. M. Abdrashitov, S. V. Ivanov and one each by Major A. U. Eremin, Captain G. S. Balashov, Lieutenants A. I. Volchkov, N. D. Dugin, V. A. Egorovich and M. E. Pivovarov.

In fierce air battles in Northern Tavria, Crimea, Belarus, Lithuania and Poland, Dugin’s character was tempered, and the number of victories he won over the enemy grew. In mid-February 1945, the commander of the 402nd Fighter Aviation Regiment, Major A.E. Rubakhin, nominated the deputy squadron commander, Captain N.D. Dugin, to the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. By that time, he had flown 325 combat missions and personally shot down 14 enemy vehicles in 77 air battles. Assault strikes destroyed 6 aircraft, 3 locomotives, 14 cars and 10 wagons with cargo, several dozen enemy soldiers and officers on the ground.

During the days of the storming of Berlin, Captain N.D. Dugin led groups of fighters into battle, stormed enemy troops and equipment, and paved the way for Soviet infantry and tanks. He shot down the last fascist plane on April 20, 1945.


Early in the morning of May 2, 1945, a few hours before the surrender of the remnants of the Berlin garrison, about 3,000 enemy soldiers and officers with tanks and self-propelled guns broke out of encirclement in the Spandau area and moved westward. On the route of this distraught group was the Dalgov airfield, which housed the 402nd air regiment. Anti-aircraft gunners, aviation mechanics, mechanics, and staff officers entered the battle with the enemy. Our pilots managed to relocate to the Verneuchen airfield and took off to attack the enemy from there.

Nikolai Dugin especially distinguished himself in the fierce battle. In one of the attacks he was seriously wounded. Bleeding, the pilot still found the strength to land the damaged plane and died in the cockpit in front of the mechanics who ran up. And there were only 7 days left until Victory Day...

By that time, Nikolai had completed 424 combat missions. Having carried out 84 air battles, he personally shot down 16 aircraft and 1 spotter balloon.

By the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR dated May 15, 1946, for the exemplary performance of combat missions of the command on the front of the fight against the Nazi invaders and the courage and heroism shown, the deputy squadron commander of the 402nd Fighter Aviation Regiment of the 265th Fighter Aviation Division, Captain Dugin Nikolai Dmitrievich, was posthumously awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union.

He was buried in a military cemetery near the Hamburg highway on the southern outskirts of the village of Dalgow (Nauen district, Brandenburg, Germany). The wrong year of the Hero’s birth is stamped on the monument.

The name of the Hero is inscribed on one of the marble slabs at the bronze monument to Soviet soldiers in Berlin who fell during the storming of the city. The memory of him is alive in his native land. On Victory Square in the city of Ramenskoye, near the Eternal Flame, there is a granite slab on which the name of the Hero is carved. A street in the city of Zhukovsky, Moscow region, is named after him.

By order of the Minister of Defense of the USSR dated August 18, 1985, Hero of the Soviet Union Captain N.D. Dugin was forever included in the lists of personnel of the military unit.

* * *

List of all known victories of Captain N.D. Dugin:
(From the book by M. Yu. Bykov - “Victories of Stalin’s Falcons”. Published by “YAUZA - EKSMO”, 2008.)


p/p
Date Downed
aircraft
Air battle location
(victory)
Their
aircraft
1 04/21/19431 Me-109NovorossiyskYak-1, Yak-9, Yak-3.
2 04/23/19431 Me-109Novorossiysk
3 04/30/19431 Me-109Crimean
4 05/27/19431 Me-109Kyiv
5 09/14/19431 Not-111Ekaterinivka
6 09/18/19431 Me-109Walk - Field
7 09/27/19431 Hs-129ostentatious
8 November 27, 19431 Ju-87Osokaryovka
9 01/30/19441 Me-109Tarkhan
10 04/17/19441 Me-109south Sarabuz
11 05/07/19441 FW-190north Dzhanshiev
12 08/06/19441 FW-190southwest Wojigames
13 03/05/19451 FW-190north - app. Stargard
14 1 balloonNeuenhagen
15 03/09/19451 Me-109north - east Garden
16 04/18/19451 FW-190Art. Reichenberg
17 04/20/19451 FW-190north Vernohe

Total aircraft shot down - 16 + 0 (and 1 observation balloon); combat sorties - 424.

The leader was given tablets of highly toxic dicoumarin with a horse dosage

January 1955 marked the beginning of the “black” mythologization of Soviet history and the peak of Nikita KHRUSHCHEV’s struggle for sole power.

His main competitor, Lavrenty BERIA, had already been accused of treason, shot and became such a scapegoat that the Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary soon stopped even mentioning his name.

Although in the famous Khrushchev report on the cult of personality of STALIN it is mentioned 61 times along with the name of the leader. Many researchers were convinced: Nikita Sergeevich not only slandered prominent government figures, but also contributed to their death.

But they couldn’t scientifically prove their versions. Recently discovered archival materials allowed the historian Alexander DUGIN for the first time to document Khrushchev's lies.

- Alexander Nikolaevich, what new did you find in the archive?

I went to the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History to see what documents on the history of the 1950s were transferred to RGASPI from the archive of the President of the Russian Federation. And I discovered a lot of interesting things.Firstly,confirmation of the words of Valentin Falin - he prepared analytical notes for all the country's leaders from Stalin to Yeltsin. Wrote Khrushchev's foreign policy speeches.

And in 2011, he risked publicly declaring that Khrushchev, wanting to seize archival documents about his participation in the repressions, ordered the creation of a group of 200 special employees not only to seize genuine documents, but also to make fakes. Secondly, I discovered these forgeries in the “Beria case” and realized that among the falsifiers there were also honest officers who left “beacons” for their descendants to recognize the forgery.

- What kind of “beacons”?

There are several of them.

In any case of high treason, which Khrushchev accused Beria of, according to the then Criminal Procedure Code, there must be photographs of the persons involved in the case, their fingerprints, and protocols of confrontations. But in the materials of the “Beria case” there is not a single photograph of him, not a single fingerprint, not a single protocol of confrontations with any of his “accomplices”.

In addition, on the interrogation protocols there is not a single signature of Beria himself, nor is there a single signature of the investigator of the Prosecutor General’s Office for the most important cases of Tsaregradsky. There is only the signature of Major Administrative Service Yuryeva. And on many of the interrogation protocols of Beria there are no mandatory office-work “marks”: the initials of the executive typist, the number of printed copies, mailing addressees, etc. But all of the above are only external signs of a fake. - Were there also internal signs of forgery?

Certainly. One of the handwritten “originals” of Beria’s letters, allegedly written by him when he was already under arrest, bears the date “VI.28.1953,” literally screaming “don’t believe it!” You can find it at the link: RGASPI, f.17, op.171, d. 463, l.163.

- What exactly do you “don’t believe”?

The letter is addressed to “To the Central Committee of the CPSU, Comrade Malenkov.” In it, Beria speaks of his devotion to the party’s cause and asks his comrades-in-arms - Malenkov, Molotov, Voroshilov, Khrushchev, Kaganovich, Bulganin and Mikoyan: “let them forgive, if anything was wrong during these fifteen years of great and intense joint work.”

And he wishes them great success in the struggle for the cause of Lenin - Stalin. In tone, it resembles a note to friends and colleagues, written by a person who is going on vacation or who has decided to stay at home for a couple of days due to a cold. And it begins like this: “I was sure that from that great criticism at the Presidium I would draw all the necessary conclusions for myself and would be useful in the team. But the Central Committee decided otherwise, I think that the Central Committee did the right thing.” After reading this I was almost speechless!

The fact is that neither before nor after Stalin’s death Beria was subjected to any “great criticism” at any meetings of the Presidium. The first meeting of the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee, at which serious accusations of Beria’s anti-state and anti-party actions were suddenly heard, took place on June 29, 1953. That is, the day AFTER this letter from Beria from his cell.

- You were almost speechless because of the date?

Yes. If the letter were genuine, it would reject the version of a number of my colleagues, which I shared one hundred percent. That Beria was killed at noon on June 26, 1953 in his mansion on Kachalova Street, now Malaya Nikitskaya.

- Killed by whom?

A special group sent to Lavrenty Pavlovich on Khrushchev’s order by Beria’s first deputy in the Ministry of State Security, Sergei Kruglov. Lieutenant General Andrei Vedenin, a former commander of the rifle corps who became the commandant of the Kremlin in September 1953, described how his unit received the order to carry out Operation Mansion to eliminate Beria. And how it was performed. Then Beria's corpse was taken to the Kremlin and presented to members of the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee. After such a “confrontation,” the Khrushchevites could, without fear, at the Plenum of the Central Committee on July 2–7, 1953, accuse Beria of all mortal sins. Win five months to clear the archives to destroy traces of your crimes.

And to instill in the people the official version of Khrushchev: they say, the former Minister of Internal Affairs of the USSR, ex-Deputy Chairman of the State Defense Committee and member of the Stalinist Politburo was shot for treason on December 23, 1953 by court decision. And with Beria alive, Khrushchev could not have hidden the poisoning of Stalin and his complicity in this crime, which I have already described in detail.

Let me remind you that, in my opinion, in this double murder - first of Stalin, then of Beria - two people were most interested. The first was the Minister of State Security in 1951 - 1953, Semyon Ignatiev, to whom Stalin had serious questions in connection with a number of scandalous trials initiated by this man. Including the “Doctors’ Case” and the murder of Kirov. On March 2, 1953, the Presidium of the Central Committee was already supposed to consider the issue of removing Ignatiev from his post.

The second interested party is Khrushchev, Ignatiev’s supervisor, who since 1946 held the most important post of deputy head of the Department of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks for checking party officials and carried out all repressions against the leadership of the party and the state. If his ward failed, Khrushchev would also have thundered to the fanfare. At 10:30 pm on March 1, Stalin was found unconscious on the floor. After his death, Beria sorted through Stalin’s archive and, studying the history of his illness, could have suspected the named couple.

A double was in prison

- What exactly was Stalin poisoned with?

Commenting on the medical data published in the recently published book by Sigismund Mironin “How Stalin was Poisoned. Forensic medical examination", the chief toxicologist of Moscow, Honored Doctor of Russia Yuri Ostapenko said that the leader was probably poisoned with tablets with an increased dose of a drug that reduces blood clotting. Since 1940, dicumarin was the first and main representative of anticoagulants; for vascular problems and thrombosis, it was recommended to use it in small doses constantly, like aspirin today. However, due to its high toxicity, it was withdrawn from use at the end of the last century.

As a prophylactic measure, drink it once a day, in the afternoon. The laboratories of the NKVD-NKGB-MGB did not cost anything to produce tablets with an increased dosage and put them in regular packaging. After all, Ignatiev himself was in charge of Stalin’s personal security. “But someone should have seen Beria alive in his cell in order to confirm the version that he spent five months in prison, awaiting execution?”

He had several doubles. And, note, the funds of Molotov, Zhdanov and a number of other recipients of Beria’s “letters” are publicly available, but there are still no funds of Khrushchev and Beria. And in the official collection “The Politburo and the Beria Case” there is not a single fact confirmed by documents that could be qualified as treason. But I managed to find an important document from Stalin’s personal archive.

He confirms that Khrushchev, accusing Beria of voluntary service in the Musavatist counterintelligence that fought the labor movement in Azerbaijan, knew very well that he was blatantly lying. This document, dated November 20, 1920, reports that Beria was infiltrated into the counterintelligence censorship department on instructions from the Azerbaijani Communist Party. It was last requested from Stalin’s archive in July 1953, when the “Beria case” was fabricated. But for obvious reasons, he was not involved in it.

The body was poured with concrete

- Are you convinced that the “letters from the cell” are fake?

Yes sir. I took them to an independent handwriting examination. The chief specialist of RGASPI, Mikhail Strakhov, helped me find Beria’s original handwriting. To keep everything clean and honest, I chose lines from which it is impossible to understand who is writing to whom, and I paid for the examination out of my own pocket so that no one could influence its result. According to experts, the samples I presented were written by different people.

And this conclusion confirms that the reprisal against Beria occurred due to the fact that, having taken the post of head of the combined Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of State Security, he was looking for an answer to the question of the real reasons for Stalin’s death. If he had remained alive, there would have been no talk of any revelations about the personality cult of Joseph Vissarionovich at the height of the Cold War. And in 1961, when Norwegian biochemists analyzed Napoleon’s hair on behalf of the French government and found out that he was poisoned with arsenic, no one would urgently convene an extraordinary congress of the CPSU. And he did not raise the unexpected question of removing Stalin’s body from the Mausoleum and concreting it. Khrushchev covered his tracks!

- Why do you care so deeply about this whole story?

I decided to do this because I can’t calmly watch how the heroes of “Fricopedia” like Rezun-Suvorov and Radzinsky try to erase from people’s memory all the positive moments of Soviet history, painting it only in dirty tones. And a person, especially a young person, who despises the past of his country, cannot respect his present and build his future in a state where his father, grandfather, great-grandfather are portrayed as cattle.

In this review I will try to collect information about modern Russian (and not only) historians. In my opinion, today there are three large pseudo-historical camps: Black Hundred (monarchist, bread-crispy), Stalinist and liberal. Outside of these three groups, there are writers who, although not specifically related to academic science, quite fall into the category of popular science, or into the category of writers in the historical genre. Finally, there is academic science, which, however, is also torn apart by ideological squabbles. You can get acquainted with the general list of historians based on citation ratings.

Stalinist camp

Emelyanov, Yuri Vasilievich- (b. 1935) Ph.D., worked at IMEMO RAS. Americanist. The historian is quite biased, a near-Stalinist, although not reaching the level of falsifications and hoaxes. I really didn’t like his interpretation of Stalin’s ideologeme about the intensification of class struggle as we approached socialism. During the perestroika era, he published the book "Notes about Bukharin. Revolution. History. Personality. M.: Young Guard, 1989." In the 2000s, as I understand it, I completely moved away from academic science. Books: Trotsky. Myths and personality. M.: Veche, 2003.; The solution to 1937. Repression: myths and facts. M.: LKI, 2016; Ten Stalinist blows. Triumph of the Generalissimo. M.: Yauza, Eksmo, 2006, etc. Moderate Stalinist.


Dugin, Alexander Nikolaevich(not to be confused with the famous imperial) - in a number of media outlets he was named a candidate of historical sciences, an associate professor. However, I could not find the alma mater or university where he is now an assistant professor. Author of the books “The Unknown Gulag”, “Stalinism: Legends and Facts”. I did not find any trace of this person in academic journals. In relation to Tukhaechvsky, I caught him manipulating sources. Moderate Stalinist.

Pykhalov, Igor Vasilievich - (b. 1962) a very prolific writer of the era of “Stalin revisionism.” Actually, it has nothing to do with history as a science. On the positive side, I can note that he did a lot to popularize the exposure of the myths of the liberal pseudo-historical school, in particular the entertaining story of the falsification of the memoirs of Anastas Mikoyan, discovered by the historian Oleg Khlevnyuk. But on the other hand, even a high school student could expose the myths of the liberals, since they don’t really bother with historical facts. In general, thanks to their meticulousness and thoroughness, Pykhalov’s books are noticeably different from reading material in the same genre. At the same time, while exposing some myths, he actively inflates others, engaging, if not in falsification and forgery (which liberals do not shun), then in distorting, pulling in some facts by the ears and ignoring others. As an example: “They say it wasn’t us who shot in Katyn, but if we did, then we’ll do the right thing.” Pykhalov is one of the main propagandists of the myth of the “Tukhachevsky conspiracy.” He fought in the LPR, but this does not make him a historian. In general, he is an outspoken Stalinist.

Vanguard of historical liberalism

Polyan, Pavel Markovich- (b. 1952) Ph.D., works at the Institute of Geology RAS. And he is indirectly related to academic history; he is a geographer by training. Author of books on the topic of Soviet prisoners of war and Ostarbeiters and the Holocaust. Moderate liberal.

History writers

Syanova, Elena- (real name of Terentyeva, Elena Evgenievna, b. 1965) professional translator. Author of a number of fiction novels on the life of the elites of the Third Reich and a historical and journalistic book " Little tragedies great history"(M.: Vremya, 2015). She is not a professional historian. She feels confident on the air of both radio "Echo of Moscow" and radio "Moscow Speaks". She caused streams of hatred and curses with her position on Katyn, which she considers a falsification by Khrushchev .Moderate patriot.

Kolpakidi, Alexander Ivanovich- (b. 1962) writer, author of numerous books on the history of intelligence services. Has nothing to do with academic science, but is a historian by training. Currently the chief editor of the Algorithm publishing house. Occasionally appeared on Echo of Moscow (http://echo.msk.ru/guests/600705-echo/) but apparently did not come to court. He often appears on the program of Leornid Volodarsky (Radio Moscow Speaks). Ideologically, the author can be classified as a moderate left-patriotic camp. The author does not have the madness of ala Kurginyan, who abandoned the Armenians. In his books, the author repeatedly presents an opposing point of view and often points out the propaganda background of both Soviet and post-Soviet publications. In short, the author is not a renegade or a liberal, but a completely digestible writer in the historical genre. Moderate leftist patriot.

Academic historians (patriotic wing)

Isaev, Alexey Valerievich— (b. 1974) Russian historian, employee of the Institute military history Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Historical Sciences (2012). One of the most popular whistleblowers of the famous paymaster Rezun. He wrote dozens of books on the history of the Second World War. Moderate patriot. It is rightly criticized for some superficiality in military specifics, and self-compilation for the sake of publishing interests. The author would rather be included in the group of academic historians, but still, according to formal criteria, I attribute him to the group of academic historians. Moderate patriot.

Zhukov, Yuri Nikolaevich- (b. 1938) Soviet and Russian historian. Doctor of Historical Sciences (1993). Leading Researcher . His page on the IRI RAS website. In liberal circles he is considered one of the main Stalinists in academic historical science. Getting acquainted with the author’s views, I can admit that he has a certain bias and an attempt to highlight some historical facts and ignore others. Moderate Stalinist.

Sakharov, Valentin Alexandrovich- (b. 1946) Soviet and Russian historian. Doctor of Historical Sciences (2005), Associate Professor of the Department of Political History of the Faculty government controlled Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov. Author's page on the faculty website. He became famous for his book - “The Political Testament” of V.I. Lenin: the reality of history and the myths of politics. M.: 2003. I read the book diagonally. It seemed extremely controversial to me. Hypothesis. that the will was fabricated by Krupskaya - unproven and poorly substantiated. Moderate Stalinist.

Academic historians (liberal wing)

Khlevnyuk, Oleg Vitalievich- Khlevnik is a great rarity for a liberal historian; he is not caught in direct falsification. He even became famous for exposing a rather unsavory story about the falsification of Mikoyan’s memoirs in 1999. In a number of cases, I do not agree with the interpretation of his events, written IMHO to please Western grant givers. In accordance with the Western paradigm, he tries in every possible way to tie Stalin to Lenin, uses newfangled Western terms from HISTORICAL literature, inappropriately and inappropriately, like “Stalin was a loyal patron,” etc. etc. Doctor of Historical Sciences. He was the chief specialist of the State Archives of the Russian Federation, now he feeds himself in the field of the Higher School of Economics, in fact, here is his page. Occasionally it flashes on Echo of Moscow, but it stands out a little from the general hubbub of the local performers. And he had one and a half million repressed during the years of great terror, and not hundreds of millions, and Stalin seemed to have led the country during the war years... In general, he is a more or less real historian. This, however, does not stop him from blurting out outright nonsense, for example about the import of bread under Stalin (see). But outside of the nonsense radio stations in academic literature, he is quite a sane representative of the pro-Western wing of modern Russian historical science.

So as not to be unfounded. Khlevnyuk likes to cite the Azerbaijani case of 1948 as an example of the connivance of corruption under Stalin, where Stalin, according to him, after abuses of position by senior officials of the Council of Ministers of the Azerbaijani SSR were revealed "gave the order to stop all this, and this check was stopped". In his “most scientific biography” of Stalin, Khlevlyuk writes that it is “only slightly
scolded the Azerbaijani leaders." The most interesting thing is that Khlevnyue accompanied this open military nonsense with links to documents! In particular, to the Politburo Resolution on the audit of the financial and economic activities of the Council of Ministers of the Azerbaijan SSR dated July 30, 1948 (book of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and regional party committees. M.: ROSPEN, 2004, pp. 113-120). Do you know what, according to the liberals, it is “to curtail everything and scold”? This is the removal of ministers and deputy ministers from their posts, the liquidation of republican bodies (azsnabbyt), the confiscation of dachas (actually mini-farms) of large officials... Yes, Bagirov was not touched, and the members of the audit commission were scolded and punished for arbitrariness (maybe not deserved, read the details), but only a complete liberal can call the execution of the Azerbaijani elites the term “reprimanded”.

Dugin Alexander Gelevich

Alexander Gelevich Dugin (born January 7, 1962, Moscow, USSR) - Russian public figure, philosopher, political scientist and translator, sociologist, leader of the International Eurasian Movement, editor-in-chief of the Tsargrad TV channel.

1982-1984 work as a translator (English, French, German) at the Institute of Market Market and Demand, Institute of Trade Information.

1987 - beginning of participation in socio-political organizations, writing the first books and articles. Creation of an intellectual neo-Eurasian movement, formulation of the foundations of neo-Eurasianism.

1989 - publication in the magazine " Soviet Literature» program texts “The Continent of Russia”, “The Subconscious of Eurasia”, “The End of the Proletarian Era”, etc.

1988 – 1991 - Work as editor-in-chief of the publishing center "EON", Translations from French "L"erreur spirite" by R. Guenon. Participation in international conferences (Paris, Madrid).

1990 – publication of the book “Paths of the Absolute”. Creation of the Historical and Religious Association "ARCTOGEA", President of the IRA "ARCTOGEA". Publication of the books “Rusia Misterio de Eurasia” (Spain) and “Continente Russia” (Italy).

Since 1991 – editor-in-chief of the magazine “Elements”

1992 - delivering a course of lectures on geopolitics at the Military Academy of the General Staff. Editor-in-Chief of the magazine "Elements". (1992-2000). Course of lectures “Russian cosmism, traditionalism, spiritualism” at the Sorbonne University (Paris). Publication of the book “Hyperborean Theory”.

1993 – 1995 – columnist for the newspaper “New Look”

1993 - a series of hour-long programs on ORT (Russian Public Television) “Secrets of the Century”. Release of the book “Conspiracy Theology”.

1994 - book “Conservative Revolution”. Lecture series Paris-Barcelona-Milan-Rome: “European Tour”. The French magazine Actuelle (M43/44/45, summer 1994) calls Dugin “the most influential thinker of the post-communist era”; cooperates with political movements - Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Liberal Democratic Party, NBP; actively works with young people; takes part in scientific conferences.

1996 - book “Templars of the Proletariat”. Start of work on the Internet, creation of the Arctogaia website (www.arctogaia.com)

1997 - publication of the textbook “Fundamentals of Geopolitics”. Weekly hour-long literary and philosophical radio programs FINIS MUNDI (FM, Radio 101).

1998 - publication of a scientific collection on the history of religions “The End of the World”, monographs “Metaphysics of the Good News”, “Mysteries of Eurasia”.

1998-2003 - Advisor to the Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation. Second edition of "Fundamentals of Geopolitics". Weekly programs on Radio Free Russia “Geopolitical Review”.

1998 – 1999 participation in the St. Petersburg Economic Forum. 1999 – presentation of the conceptual project “OUR WAY” within the FORUM. Release of the book “Absolute Motherland”.

1998-1999 course of lectures “Traditionalism as a language” within the framework of the “NEW UNIVERSITY”. Graduated from the correspondence department of the Novocherkassk Academy with a degree in Economics.

1999-2000 -- Teaching the course “Philosophy of Politics” at MNEPU (International Ecological and Political Science University). Honorary member of the “Economic-Philosophical Assembly” at the Central Educational Center of Moscow State University. Third and fourth (expanded) editions of “Fundamentals of Geopolitics”.

2000 - creation of OPOD "Eurasia", Chairman of the Political Council. Chairman of the Center for Geopolitical Expertise under the Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation (sector of the Expert Advisory Council on National Security Issues). Publication of the monograph “Russian Thing” in 2 volumes. Defense of a candidate's dissertation in the specialty "philosophy of science" - "Evolution of the paradigmatic foundations of science" at the North Caucasus Scientific Center (Rostov-on-Don)

2002 - transformation of the OPPO "Eurasia" into the political party "Eurasia". Chairman of the Political Council of the Eurasia Party. Opening

Eurasian Internet portal evrazia.org. Publication of the books “The Evolution of the Paradigmatic Foundations of Science” and “The Philosophy of Traditionalism.” Participation as a leading expert-analyst in the Expert Council of the Directorate of Channel One.

2003 -- Creation of the International “Eurasian Movement”, Leader of the Movement and Chairman of the Eurasian Committee. Opening of the philosophical portal arcto.ru. Awarding the title of honorary professor at the Eurasian National University. L. Gumileva (Astana).

2004 -- Defense of doctoral dissertation "Transformation political structures and institutions in the process of modernization of traditional society" in Rostov-on-Don. Resumption of lectures of the “NEW UNIVERSITY”. Publication of the books “Philosophy of Politics”, “Project Eurasia”, “Eurasian Mission of Nursultan Nazarbayev”, “Philosophy of War”. Release of translations of the book “Fundamentals of Geopolitics” in Turkish, Arabic and Serbian. Participation of a group (11 representatives, 5 large cities) under the leadership of A.G. Dugin as public observers in the parliamentary elections of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Participation in the summit of the heads of the Eurasian Economic Community countries in Astana (June 23, 2004) and delivering a keynote speech “On the role of Eurasianism in integration processes in the post-Soviet space.” Meetings and interviews with the President of Kazakhstan N. Nazarbayev. Publication of articles, interviews, comments and analytical examinations in the Russian and foreign press - including as a columnist in the newspapers Izvestia, Krasnaya Zvezda, Literaturnaya Gazeta, Komsomolskaya Pravda, Argumenty i Fakty.

2005 -- Editor-in-Chief of the Orthodox TV channel SPAS. Host of the weekly analytical program “Vekhi”. Visit to Washington. Speeches at the US State Department, the Hopkins Institute, polemics with Z. Brzezinski, F. Fukuyama, etc. The Eurasian Forum is being held in Turkey with the participation of ex-President of Turkey S. Demirel and President of Northern Cyprus R. Denktash. Speeches in the national press and on Turkish TV outlining Eurasian positions. The growing popularity of Eurasian geopolitical ideas (the Moscow-Iran-Turkey alliance) in the Turkish General Staff. Meeting with generals Vali Kuciuk and Tunger Kilinch. Creation of the “Eurasian Youth Union”.

2006 -- Publication of the book “Pop Culture and Signs of the Times.” Publication in Russian of the book by the French writer J. Parvulesco “Vladimir Putin – Man of Destiny” (with comments and foreword by Dugin). Vice-Speaker of the Federation Council A. Torshin, head of the Committee on international politics Federation Council M. Margelov, Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation A. Sokolov, other government and public figures. Teaching at the Faculty of Philosophy of Moscow State University - the course “Postphilosophy”.

2007 -- Active participation as an expert and public figure on the central television channels of the Russian Federation (First, NTV, TVC). A textbook on Social Studies was written by order of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation. Dugin was declared persona non grata in Ukraine for anti-American statements. Beginning of regular interaction with the Russian Foreign Ministry, meeting with Foreign Minister S. Lavrov. Weekly program “Russian Thing” on the radio Russian News Service. Publication of the book “Postmodern Geopolitics”

2008 -- Publication of the book “Postphilosophy”, “Radical Subject and His Double”. Lecture series “Archaeomodern”. Preparation of a course of lectures at the Faculty of Sociology of Moscow State University.

2009 - teaching at the sociological faculty of Moscow State University special courses “Structural Sociology” (sociology of imagination), “Sociology of Russian society”, courses “Sociology of geopolitical processes”, “Ethnosociology”; organization of a series of television lectures on Eurasia-TV; publication of the magazine " Russian time" (Chief Editor); presentations with a course of lectures at Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don), at St. Petersburg State University (philosophical faculty); visit to the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, meeting with the President of the PMR I. Smirnov; publication of the books “Postphilosophy”, “Radical Subject and His Double”, “The Fourth Political Theory”; preparation for publication, preface and comments of Alain de Benoit’s book “Against Liberalism”.

2010 - appointment as acting head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations of the Faculty of Sociology of Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov, lecturing courses, working at the Center for Conservative Studies (Center for Conservative Studies), publishing magazines, extensive expert and journalistic activities.

2011 – publication of the books “Sociology of Russian Society” and “Martin Heidegger and the Possibility of Russian Philosophy”

2012 -- A. Dugin was appointed a member of the Committee of Advisors under the Chairman of the State Duma S. Naryshkin

2011 - 2014 - work at the sociological faculty of Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov Head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations. Defense of a doctoral dissertation in sociology (on the topic “Sociology of Imagination”). Development of a number of courses and special courses on the sociology of politics, international relations, ethnosociology, and the politics of national relations. Conducting seminars at the Center for Conservative Research and publishing annual conceptual collections on the sections “Tradition”, “Deconstruction”, “Ethnosociology”, etc. Publication of books “Ethnosociology”, “Theory of a Multipolar World”, “Geopolitics of Russia”, “Sociology of Imagination”. Publication of the first volumes of the Noomachia cycle - “In Search of the Dark Logos”, “Three Logos”

since 2015 – editor-in-chief of the conservative TV channel “Tsargrad”, publication of books in the series on the history and paradigmatics of cultures and civilizations “Noomakhia” in 12 volumes

Monographs and textbooks in Russian:

  • Monograph “The Paths of the Absolute”. M., 1990;
  • Monograph "Conspiracyology". M., Arktogeya, ROF "Eurasia", 1992, 2005. ISBN 5-85928-010-6, ISBN 5-902322-03-0
  • Monograph "Hyperborean theory". M., 1993;
  • Monograph "Conservative Revolution". M., 1994;
  • Monograph "Templars of the Proletariat". M., 1996;
  • Monograph “Mysteries of Eurasia”. M., 1996;
  • Monograph "Metaphysics of the Good News". M., 1996;
  • Monograph “Fundamentals of Geopolitics”. M., 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001 (translated into French, Romanian, Serbian, Georgian, Italian, Spanish and English);
  • Monograph “Absolute Motherland”. M., 1999;
  • Our way . M., 1999 - Eurasian path. M., 2002;
  • Monograph “Russian Thing”. In 2v. M., 2001;
  • Monograph "Evolution of the paradigmatic foundations of science". M., 2002; .
  • Monograph “Philosophy of Traditionalism” (Lectures of the “New University”). M., 2002;
  • Textbook "Fundamentals of Eurasianism". M., 2002;
  • Monograph Project "Eurasia". M., 2004;
  • Monograph “The Eurasian Mission of Nursultan Nazarbayev”. M., 2004. ISBN 9785902322016
  • Monograph “Philosophy of Politics”. M., 2004;
  • Monograph “Philosophy of War”. M., 2004;
  • Monograph "Conspiracyology". M., 2005;
  • “Pop culture and signs of the times”, M., Amphora, 496 pp., 2005. ISBN 5-94278-903-7
  • Project "Eurasia", M., 2006;
  • Textbook “Social studies for citizens of New Russia” M., 2007. ISBN 978-5-90359-03-2
  • Monograph “Geopolitics of Postmodernism” M., Amphora, 384 pp., 2007. 978-5-367-00616-2
  • “Signs of the Great Nord. Hyperborean theory". Veche, M., 2008 (Reprint of the “Hyperbraean Theory”). ISBN 978-5-9533-3352-8
  • Monograph “Postphilosophy” M., 2009.
  • Monograph “The Radical Subject and His Double” M., 2009.
  • Monograph “The Fourth Political Theory” M.: Amphora, 2009.
  • Textbook "Structural Sociology". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
  • Textbook “Logos and mythos. Deep regional studies". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
  • Monograph “Crisis: The End of Economic Theory” M., 2010.
  • Monograph "Martin Heidegger: the philosophy of another Beginning". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
  • Textbook “Sociology of Russian society. Russia between Chaos and Logos". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
  • Textbook "Sociology of Imagination". - M.: Academic project, 2010.
  • Monograph “Martin Heidegger: the possibility of Russian philosophy”. - M.: Academic project, 2011.
  • Monograph “Archaeomodern”, 2011.
  • Textbook "Geopolitics". - M.: Academic project, 2011.
  • Textbook "Ethnosociology". - M.: Academic project, 2011.
  • Textbook “Sociology of geopolitical processes”, M., 2011.
  • Textbook "Geopolitics of Russia". - M.: Academic project, Gaudeamus, 2012. - 424 p. - (Gaudeamus). - 1000 copies, ISBN 978-5-8291-1398-8, ISBN 978-5-98426-122-7.
  • Monograph “Theory of a Multipolar World”, M., 2012.
  • Monograph “In Search of the Dark Logos”, M., 2012. - 516 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1426-8
  • Textbook “International Relations. Paradigms, theory, sociology", M., Academic project, 2014. ISBN 978-5-8291-1659-0
  • USA and the New World Order. co-authored with Olavo de Carvalho, Vide, 2013.
  • Monograph “The Fourth Way”. - M., 2014. - 683 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1625-5.
  • Monograph “Martin Heidegger. The last god." - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 846 p. - .
  • Eurasian revenge of Russia. - M., Algorithm, 256 pp., 2014. ISBN 978-5-4438-0855-0
  • "Imagination. Philosophy, sociology, structures", M., Academic Project, 2015. ISBN 978-5-8291-1828-0
  • Russian war. - M., Algorithm, 272 pp., 2015. ISBN 978-5-09-067988-7 -9
  • Martin Heidegger. Metapolitics. Eschatology of existence. - Academic Project, 2016. ISBN: 978-5-8291-1797-9.

Series "Noomakhia"

  • Monograph “Noomachy: wars of the mind. Three Logos: Apollo, Dionysus, Cybele." - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 447 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1594-4
  • Monograph “Noomachy: wars of the mind. Civilizations of the borders: Russia, American civilization, Semites and their civilization, Arabic Logos, Turanian Logos.” - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 694 p. 978-5-8291-1634-7.
  • Monograph “Noomachy: wars of the mind. Logos of Europe: Mediterranean civilization in time and space." - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 530 p. 978-5-8291-1633-0.
  • Monograph “Noomachy: wars of the mind. On the other side of the West. Indo-European civilizations: Iran, India.” - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 495 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1656-9.
  • Monograph “Noomachy: wars of the mind. On the other side of the West. China, Japan, Africa, Oceania." - M.: Academic project, 2014. - 551 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1657-6.
  • Monograph “Noomachia. Wars of the mind. German Logos. An apophatic man." - M.: Academic project, 2015. - 639 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1772-6
  • Monograph “Noomachia. Wars of the mind. French Logos. Orpheus and Melusine." - M.: Academic project, 2015. - 439 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1796-2
  • Monograph “Noomachy: wars of the mind. England or Britain? Maritime mission and positive subject.” - M.: Academic project, 2015. - 595 p. 978-5-8291-1795-5
  • Monograph “Noomachy: wars of the mind. Latin logos. The sun and the cross." - M.: Academic project, 2016. - 719 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1859-4.
  • Monograph “Noomachy: wars of the mind. Hellenic logos. Valley of Truth." - M.: ISBN 978-1593680381
    • Dugin Iskander Feisaliny jeopolitidgi, Beyruth, 2004.
    • Alexander Dugin. Die Vierte Politische Theorie, Arktos, 2013. ISBN 978-1-907166-62-4
    • Alexander Dugin. Konflikte der Zukunft. Die Rückkehr der Geopolitik., 2014. ISBN 978-3887412913
    • Alexander Dugin. Baron Ungern von Sternberg - der letzte Kriegsgott. Junges Forum Nr. 7, 2007. ISBN 978-3937129327
    • Alexander Dugin. Evola von Links: Metaphysisches Weltbild und antibürgerlicher Geist, Regin-Verlag, 2006. ISBN 978-3937129273

    French

    • Alexandre Douguin. L'Empire soviétique et les nationalismes à l'époque de la pérestroïka, in XXX, Nation et Empire, GRECE, 1991.
    • Alexandre Douguin. Le prophète de l'eurasisme, Avatar Éditions, 2006. ISBN 978-0954465278
    • Dughin A. Russia. Misterio de Eurasia. Madrid, 1992.
    • Alexander Dugin. Eurasia. La rivoluzione conservatrice in Russia, Pagine, 2015. ISBN 978-8875574574
    • Alexander Dugin, Alexander Benoist. Eurasia, Vladimir Putin e la grande politica, Controcorrente, 2014. ISBN 978-8898000036
    • Alexander Dugin. Russia segreta, Edizioni all'insegna del veltro, 2013. ASIN B00DW22LEQ

    Spanish

    • Alexander Dugin. "Rusica/ Misterio de Eurasia". Madrid, 1990;

    Portuguese

    • Alexander Dugin. Teoria do Mundo Multipolar, IAEG, 2012. ASIN B01FKTSRXM
    • Alexander Dugin. Geopolitica da Russia Contemporanea, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015. ISBN 978-1518610394
    • Alexander Dugin. A Grande Guerra dos Continentes, Antagonista Editora, 2011. ASIN B004YR14WS
    • Alexander Dugin. Eurasianismo: Ensaios Selecionados, Zarinha Centro Cultura, 2012. ISBN 978-8599972137
    • Alexandre Dugin, Olavo de Carvalho. Os Eua e a Nova Ordem Mundial, VIDE Editorial, 2013. ASIN B00GTQ49GU
    • Aleksandr Dugin, Antonio Bessa, Sonia Sebastiao. Finis Mundi: A Ultima Cultura #6, Instituto de Altos Estudos em Geopolitica e Ciencias Auxiliares, 2013. ASIN B00B9AS9FS

    Serbian

    • Dugin A. Nova Hyperboreyska Revelyatsiya, Beograd, 1999.
    • Dugin A. Conspirologiya, Beograd, 2001.
    • Dugin A. Osnove geopolitike, Beograd, 2004.

    Turkish

    • Dugin A. Rus jeopolitigi avrasyaci yaklasim. Ankara, 2003.
    • Dugin A. Moska-Ankara aksiaynin, Istanbul, 2007.
    • Dugin A. Misyonin avrasyagilik Nursultanain Nazarbaevin, Ankara, 2006.